Dingpolitik: from an interview with Bruno Latour. Link: re-public: ing democracyRe-public. K.K.: You talk about the demon of the. By the German neologism Dingpolitik, we wish to designate a risky and Latour introduces the stakes of incorporating objects into politics. Bruno Latour. In Bruno Latour & Peter Weibel (eds.), Making Things Public. MIT Press. pp. Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik.B. Latour – – Krisis
|Published (Last):||9 November 2009|
|PDF File Size:||5.24 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.97 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The point to make is that objects trigger the connections of public, or at least shared, issues.
From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik – An Introduction to Making Things Public |
Where paradigm shifts of ways of thinking in politic, art, or science have always been labeled chronologically, one following the other, we now enter a time where time itself is condensed. How these connected things are going to play a role within society remains little or undiscovered territory. Now, the question rises how things should be shaped; what is the aesthetic of these things within current society? Atmospheres of Democracy, Cambridge: The relevancy of performing research into the topic of an Internet of Things lies in the fact that, although seemingly the concept has faded into the background, reality might be catching up.
Legitimacy in Realist Thought.
And the point of these references? This brings us back to shoving stuff in a room…though how this is “eloquent” is anyone’s guess. Emery – – International Journal of Ethics 25 4: Here, he introduces a new approach, by suggesting to look into matter of concern, rather than matters of fact.
Latour continuous by pointing out that another mistake made in Western political history is that it focused on settling differences, instead of trying to co-evolve with a set of indifferences.
Dingpolitik and an internet of things
What if objects themselves can gather, spread and claim issues, turning each other into matters-of-concern? This entry has no external links. Find it on Scholar. Here he makes the argument for disagreement and cohabiting, especially with indifferences. How do they manage to bring in the relevant parties? Lahour – – American Journal of Jurisprudence 33 1: Navigation menu Personal tools Log in.
From realpolitik to dingpolitik
Also, I do some occasional freelance work, where disciplines differ from web-design to workshops to product design. This article has no associated abstract.
Dante and Francesca da Rimini: Although ordering things in time has been quite sorted out, we now have to move into anew territory: A catalog of questions in this text. Is there something like a matter-of-fact? To continue, this brings in another problem: Where the web 2. Setup an account with your affiliations in dingpolitim to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy.
The Origin of Political Liberty in Confucianism: Where this has up to now never been looked into as being political, objects are. Where the focus used to lie on body politics, imagining the state as something to be formed with one General Willwe should be looking into politics of pragmatism.
Dingpolitik and an internet of things | Masters of Media
Class of Alumni: The “End of Ideology” Revisited: No keywords specified fix it. After an internship at Mediamatic, Idngpolitik wanted to get more involved in the digital side of new media.
Everything has become contemporary. This, asserts Latour, is what the exhibition in question explores. Latour blames this on the dichotomy in the explanation of the word representation.
The concept dingpolirik Realpolitik has shifted since the days of Bismarck. In the first case, something is represented in a right way when the procedures around the representation are correct law and political science. This page was last modified on 24 Novemberat No categories specified categorize this paper.
Because all representation involves re presentation.